Materiality and Cultural Identity in Chinese Mixed-Media Painting after Western Neo-Expressionism

Authors

  • Peng Peng Faculty of Creative Industry and Communication, City University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 58000, Malaysia
  • Ramin Hajianfard Faculty of Creative Industry and Communication, City University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 58000, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4rrx1v88

Keywords:

Chinese mixed-media painting; materiality; cultural identity; cultural memory.

Abstract

This paper explores how Chinese mixed-media painting developed materiality as a means of constructing cultural identity after the influence of Western Neo-Expressionism. While artists such as Anselm Kiefer demonstrated how materials could convey history, memory, and trauma, Chinese artists transformed this approach within their own cultural context. Materials including ink, xuan paper, mineral pigments, soil, ash, fabric, and industrial debris became more than technical tools or visual effects. Through layering, burning, cutting, and recontextualization, they express cultural memory, regional experience, modernization, and social change. The paper argues that Chinese mixed-media painting shifted from “material as technique” to “material as meaning,” forming a local visual language that connects tradition, modernity, and contemporary Chinese identity. It also warns against formal imitation, technical display, and superficial cultural labeling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gladston, P. (2014). Contemporary Chinese art: A critical history. Reaktion Books.

[2] Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. (2007). Anselm Kiefer [Exhibition webpage]. https://www.guggenheim-bilbao.eus/en/exhibitions/anselm-kiefer.

[3] Zhao, K. (2014, July 29). Review of the re-evaluation of the mixed-media painting exhibition of the 12th National Fine Arts Exhibition. China Artists Association. https://caanet.org.cn/newsdetail.mx?id=795.

[4] Li, J. (2014). The encounter of materiality and spirit: The expansion of mixed-media painting materials and artistic presentation [Master’s thesis]. Northeast Normal University.

[5] National Galleries of Scotland. (n.d.). Neo-expressionism [Glossary webpage]. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/glossary-terms/neo-expressionism.

[6] Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. (2000). Anselm Kiefer [Exhibition webpage]. https://www.guggenheim-bilbao.eus/en/exhibitions/anselm-kiefer-2-2.

[7] Clark, J. (2009). Political expression and the recent Chinese landscape painting of Ding Fang. E-MAJ: Electronic Melbourne Art Journal, 4. https://doi.org/10.38030/emaj.2009.4.3.

[8] Liu, W. (2021). The visual significance of materiality in mixed-media art. Qilu Realm of Arts, (6), 53–57.

[9] Chen, G. (2024). Inheritance and development of ancient Chinese painting materials and techniques in mixed-media painting. Art Observation, (5), 100–102.

[10] Chen, L. (2010). Materiality display and humanistic creation: Material attributes and language transformation in Chinese contemporary art. Art Observation, (10), 105–107.

[11] Jiang, H., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Innovative integration of folk paper-art elements in contemporary mixed-media painting. CNKI. https://www.cnki.net.

[12] Ding, Y. (2021). Continuation and transformation: On the application of traditional paper media in mixed-media painting. [Journal title unknown], 17–18.

[13] Arasse, D. (2014). Anselm Kiefer. Thames & Hudson.

[14] Wu, H. (2012). A story of ruins: Presence and absence in Chinese art and visual culture. Reaktion Books.

[15] Morgner, C. (2015). Multiculturalism and the global art world: The policies of large scale art exhibitions. OMNES: Journal of Multicultural Society, 6(1), 62–98. https://doi.org/10.15685/omnes.2015.07.6.1.62.

Downloads

Published

07-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Peng, P., & Ramin Hajianfard. (2026). Materiality and Cultural Identity in Chinese Mixed-Media Painting after Western Neo-Expressionism. Academic Journal of Art and Design, 1(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.54097/4rrx1v88