Theoretical Reflections on AI-Mediated Jazz Improvisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/k2qxqs63Keywords:
Jazz music; artificial intelligence; improvisation; creative agency; human-computer interaction.Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) technology within music has changed the improvisational performing style and aesthetic underpinning of jazz. Based on the philosophy of technology and the aesthetics of music, this article identifies three levels on which AI intervention has restructured the basic configuration of jazz improvisation: the improvisation subject has expanded from the performer to a human-machine consortium, the creative activity has shifted from the individual's internal expression to distributed generation in the interaction, and the focus of aesthetic attention has shifted from the finished product to the generation process itself. In a sense, then, the question AI poses for jazz improvisation is not whether machines can improvise like humans, but how much definitive meaning the term "improvisation" has in the era of technology. From this perspective, AI is not only a tool or an opponent, but has become an active participant in improvisation. This shift of perspective is important because it encourages the concept of improvisation to expand from the creative behaviour of a single subject to the generation of events during interaction between human and machine, providing a new direction for understanding the relationship between humans and technology in the creation of music.
Downloads
References
[1] Bhandari, K., Chang, S., Lu, T., Enus, F. R., Bradshaw, L. B., Herremans, D., & Colton, S. (2025, June). ImprovNet: Generating controllable musical improvisations with iterative corruption refinement. In 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
[2] Nika, J., Chemillier, M., & Assayag, G. (2017). Improtek: Introducing scenarios into human-computer music improvisation. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 14(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3056501
[3] Yang, L. C., & Lerch, A. (2020). On the evaluation of generative models in music. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(9), 4773–4784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04049-2
[4] Lewis, G. E. (2000). Too many notes: Computers, complexity and culture in voyager. Leonardo Music Journal, 10, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/096112100570585
[5] Bown, O. (2021). Beyond the creative species: Making machines that make art and music. The MIT Press.
[6] Benford, S., Amerotti, M., Sturm, B., & Martinez Avila, J. (2024, September). Negotiating autonomy and trust when performing with an AI musician. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (pp. 1–10).
[7] Shank, D. B., Stefanik, C., Stuhlsatz, C., Kacirek, K., & Belfi, A. M. (2023). AI composer bias: Listeners like music less when they think it was composed by an AI. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(3), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000447
[8] Berkowitz, A. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and musicking: A philosophical inquiry. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41(5), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2024.41.5.393
[9] Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012, January). Computational creativity: The final frontier?. In Ecai (Vol. 12, pp. 21–26). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-084-0-21
[10] Miller, B. (2020). “All of the rules of jazz”: Stylistic models and algorithmic creativity in human-computer improvisation. Music Theory Online, 26(3).
[11] Frisk, H. (2020). Aesthetics, interaction and machine improvisation. Organised Sound, 25(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771820000061
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Art and Design
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
