From Composition to Production: How Digital Audio Reshapes the Music-Making Workflow

Authors

  • Junhao Yu School of Central Conservatory of Music, Beijing 100000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/enydq311

Keywords:

Digital audio workstation, Music production, Creative labor, Democratization, MIDI, Streaming standards, Algorithmic production

Abstract

 Digitalisation of music production tools has completely reorganised the process for developing musical ideas, recording them, arranging them and delivering them to audiences from a traditional reliance on specialised facilities, professionals as intermediaries and large sums of capital, to an individual creator engaging in such activities within their own domestic space using consumer-grade devices. Examine how digital audio technology, primarily digital audio workstations (DAWs), MIDI-based virtual instrumentations, and AI-assisted mixing and mastering software/tools have changed the music-creation process from creation to production by referring to the materialist technological paradigm, creative labour theories, and recording-as-composition viewpoint as the basic theoretical support for this study. Three intertwined arguments are presented below: Digital tools did not merely speed up existing work procedures but reshaped the cognitive and creative activities by means of which music was produced and performed; The mass media's prevailing portrayal of digital music production as a democratic process conceals substantial continuity concerning who gets access to such works and on what basis; And the incorporation of AI-assisted production tools and Streaming Platform technical standards into the production process has become a new stage of Algorithmic control over Musical decisions whose impact on Creative Independence remains unexplored. Based on this, several recommendations for music Industry governance, creative labour policy and the Future development of musical Craft are put forward in this conclusion section.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Théberge P. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology. Wesleyan University Press; 1997.

[2] Hesmondhalgh D, Baker S. Creative Labour: Media Industries and the Cultural Politics of Work. Routledge; 2011.

[3] Zuboff S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books; 1988.

[4] Burgess RJ. The Art of Music Production: The Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2013.

[5] Born G. Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. University of California Press; 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520916845

[6] Meier LM. Popular Music as Promotion: Music and Branding in the Digital Age. Polity Press; 2017.

[7] Hracs BJ. A creative industry in transition: The rise of digitally self-sufficient music producers. Growth and Change. 2012;43(3):442–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2012.00593.x

[8] Spotify for Artists. Loudness normalization and audio quality guidelines. Spotify; 2023. Available from: https://artists.spotify.com/en/help/article/loudness-normalization

[9] Watson A. Global recorded music industry revenues 1999–2022. Statista; 2023. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272305/global-revenue-of-the-music-industry

[10] Leyshon A. The software slump: Digital music, the democratization of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector within the musical economy. Environment and Planning A. 2009;41(6):1309–1331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a40352

Downloads

Published

20-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yu, J. (2026). From Composition to Production: How Digital Audio Reshapes the Music-Making Workflow. Academic Journal of Art and Design, 1(1), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.54097/enydq311